Language:
switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: First ... 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 ... Last
[#] Tue Nov 04 2008 16:53:02 EST from simplygorgeous @ My Castle Wall

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

i still havent had any sex .....

dont know what im waiting for hmmmmmm



[#] Tue Nov 04 2008 17:00:51 EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


I like monkeys.

[#] Tue Nov 04 2008 17:10:41 EST from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


LS, and Michael Jackson... I wouldn't have made that connection until today.

[#] Tue Nov 04 2008 18:55:34 EST from simplygorgeous @ My Castle Wall

Subject: men yummmmm

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

i like hairy men ..well ok not to hairy just enought to run my nails into yummmmmmm

and men stop damn well shaving your bits ..stop it its not natural leave it alone



[#] Tue Nov 04 2008 19:00:52 EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


thanks, we needed something even more inane than the election discussion.

[#] Tue Nov 04 2008 19:08:41 EST from simplygorgeous @ My Castle Wall

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Wed Nov 05 2008 12:00:52 AM UTC from LoanShark@uncnsrd (Uncensored)


thanks, we needed something even more inane than the election discussion.

lol im in australia so i dont realy care  who runs your country ..

so whos hairy around this world .gimme gimme a look

do we talk elections or erections in here anyway



[#] Tue Nov 04 2008 19:25:03 EST from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I'm not tremendously hairy, but I keep a beard.

[#] Tue Nov 04 2008 19:31:26 EST from simplygorgeous @ My Castle Wall

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

yeh i dont mind facial hair as long as its kept neat n tidy

[#] Tue Nov 04 2008 19:47:21 EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


I prefer hairy monkeys.

[#] Tue Nov 04 2008 20:21:56 EST from triLcat @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I like hairy men. That's why I'm voting Grover for president.



[#] Tue Nov 04 2008 22:16:13 EST from simplygorgeous @ My Castle Wall

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Wed Nov 05 2008 12:47:21 AM UTC from LoanShark@uncnsrd (Uncensored)


I prefer hairy monkeys.

eeewww you realy do have a thing with monkeys ..eeewwwwwww lol

goes and picks knuckles of the ground and go sits in chair and waits !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



[#] Wed Nov 05 2008 06:18:26 EST from dothebart @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

<-bear

[#] Wed Nov 05 2008 13:20:00 EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


for (;;) inanity++;

[#] Wed Nov 05 2008 13:48:28 EST from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Bad form.

while(true) ++inanity;

That would be better form. You save a little in clock cycles using the prefix operator, and you more clearly express your meaning using while(true) instead of for(;;).

But your mileage may vary.

[#] Wed Nov 05 2008 13:56:06 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Why worry about clock cycles? Take it slow, enjoy it... this isn't a race to the finish line. :)

[#] Wed Nov 05 2008 14:52:08 EST from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Well, hell, if that's how you feel:

#include <unistd.h>

unsigned int inanity = 1000;
while(true) sleep(++inanity);

[#] Wed Nov 05 2008 15:04:09 EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


well, on any decent compiler there shouldn't be any difference between the prefix and postfix versions. postfix is more commonly used from what i've seen.

[#] Wed Nov 05 2008 15:10:51 EST from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Yeah, on a good, optimizing compiler, post- vs. pre- fix shouldn't matter.

But when you start talking about inanity, I usually presume a Microsoft compiler.

And you won't have the optimiser on when you're debugging.

[#] Wed Nov 05 2008 15:15:24 EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


erm, there should be no difference, even with optimization off, i'd think -- either expression is just an rvalue that is never assigned to anything. so it evaluates as either:

load (NOP) increment store
-or-
load increment (NOP) store

What's the difference?

Go to page: First ... 19 20 21 22 [23] 24 25 26 27 ... Last