Language:
switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: First ... 62 63 64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 ... Last
[#] Wed Jul 28 2010 17:55:48 EDT from cellofellow @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Threaded JavaScript is a relatively new development, and browser
support is iffy. It does exist, though. Google around and you'll find
some stuff about it.

[#] Thu Jul 29 2010 10:28:52 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

We're not yet at a point where you can count on it being there. Unfortunately, we're still at a stage where you have to account for the horrible JavaScript engine in Internet Explorer.

[#] Thu Jul 29 2010 15:04:51 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Oh wow, it's the Windows 3.1 event loop all over again.

You got any better ideas? But yes, that appears to be exactly what's going on.

[#] Thu Jul 29 2010 16:45:40 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Ahhh, finally a question that I can not find an answer to on the web that I can ask you guys.
I have (in java) an abstract base class.
I have a class2 that extends base class.
I have a class3 that extends class2.
I have overridden method1 in both class2 and class3.
in class3.method1, I call super.method1 and the error I get is that I can't directly call the abstract method in baseclass.
but I don't want to, I just want to go one level up, not all the levels up.
How to do that?

[#] Thu Jul 29 2010 17:03:03 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

false alarm.
turns out there was a typo in class2.method1 so it didn't pick it up as a parent, so the next parents was in fact the abstract class.


[#] Thu Jul 29 2010 18:14:39 EDT from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

You got any better ideas?





Install WIN32s?

[#] Wed Aug 04 2010 12:47:12 EDT from johnnyl @ Uncensored

Subject: Re:

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

You can't get more 'fat' than a browser.



[#] Wed Aug 04 2010 16:38:07 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

Subject: Re:

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

yes you can. I mean I see what you're saying, but you could write a better all purpose fat client.

[#] Wed Aug 04 2010 17:18:19 EDT from Nite*Star @ Uncensored

Subject: Re:

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Aug 4 2010 4:38pm from Ford II @uncnsrd
Subject: Re:
yes you can. I mean I see what you're saying, but you could write a

better all purpose fat client.

Right, like what Google is working on ....

[#] Wed Aug 04 2010 21:47:26 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

Subject: Re:

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

actually yes. I don't agree with what they're doing, but they're definetly doing a better job than everybody else.

[#] Thu Aug 12 2010 14:42:32 EDT from mrthermister @ Uncensored

Subject: Visual Fox Pro Connection

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I need to connect a Visual Fox Pro database to Access. Has anybody done this successfully? If so, what are the steps?

 

Thanks



[#] Thu Aug 12 2010 19:35:10 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Today at work I was using sales force to enter a case comment. We use salesforce for bugtracking.
As I went to hit save, I got an error saying that the case had been updated by somebody while I was writing my comment so by the time I hit save my state was stale, and I should click here to refresh.
Of course refreshing blows away your comment.
This having been the third time this happened to me, I thought I'd try something else, and I hit the back button instead, the browser is usually pretty good about reproducing state.
Except that salesforce is extremely AJAX heavy and pretty much ALL the controls on the page are generated by javascript and aren't part of the source page, so the browser is unable to reproduce the page the same way and as a result, my comment was gone.

So when you go to hit save on salesforce, you're basically gambling on whether or not you're going to lose your work.
Certainly plenty of blame goes to salesforce, but there's some to be doled out in the inherently flawed design of the web, or at least what it's turned into.

My coworker suggested that I do what he does: write everything in notepad then cut and paste when you're done.

Do I have to say it? Sure I do.

Fucking Progress.

[#] Fri Aug 13 2010 11:59:59 EDT from Ahff Rowe @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Having been burned by the same issue a bazillion times, I do the same.

Fucking Notepad.

[#] Fri Aug 13 2010 14:10:55 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Having been burned by the same issue a bazillion times, I do the same.


Fucking Notepad.

Really need to replace this shitty web thing, and what google is planning on doing isn't any better.

[#] Mon Aug 16 2010 18:54:19 EDT from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


For those who still think runtime VM optimization is always worse,

http://blog.llvm.org/2010/05/glasgow-haskell-compiler-and-llvm.html

[#] Tue Aug 17 2010 10:31:26 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I would think it would be worse (having my usual 2 paragraphs of experience) but there was a good argument there: the closer you get to the hardware before you do your optomization, the more optimization tuned to the specific machine you can do.

But then again, if you wrote a good to-the-native-processor back end you'd get the same thing, and I think they're argument against that was "It's hard."

So if you're not willing to do it the right way, sure LLVM sounds like a great 1st choice. :-)

[#] Tue Aug 17 2010 10:32:08 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I believe it was this comment:
Building a high performance compiler backend is a huge amount of work,

Well, yes, it is, but the tradeoff is you end up with a good product.

[#] Tue Aug 17 2010 14:56:50 EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored

Subject: Re:

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

what was that column for haskel on that matrix how programmers see each others?



[#] Tue Aug 17 2010 21:53:32 EDT from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


I'm not sure what the icon is for "broke down old computational monadologists".

Go to page: First ... 62 63 64 65 [66] 67 68 69 70 ... Last