switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: First ... 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 ... Last
[#] Fri Feb 20 2009 15:10:47 EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

the way outlook "tasks" work is, you receive an email (usually from your pointy haired boss) in a special format which outlook recognizes as a task request. It's like a meeting request in that you can accept or decline it, I think. Then it goes into (in the default Outlook 2007 screen organization) a window pane in the bottom right of your outlook window, which shows a short to-do list organized by due date. You can right click each one to mark it completed, at which point, if your pointy haired boss has requested it, they will receive a notification.

[#] Fri Feb 20 2009 15:39:07 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Here are the abilities listed by Bynari for the connector (with regard
to tasks) --

Ability to share tasks folder
Ability to create, delete and modify tasks
Ability to create recurring tasks
Ability to search tasks
Ability to assign tasks to another person
Ability to accept tasks
Ability to decline/reject tasks
Ability to set priority levels to a defined task
Ability to attach files to a task
Ability to set the status of a task (e.g. Started, Completed, In-progress, etc)
Ability to mark a task as complete
Ability to add notes to a task

[#] Fri Feb 20 2009 17:07:32 EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


[#] Tue Feb 24 2009 13:39:05 EST from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

fine if everyone is smart, but I like to write software that is capable

of being installed by people that aren't smart without them having to

pester the support resources.

If you think doing anything relating to ldap won't require pestering support people, be they from the smart camp or not, you are in for a surprise.
I've never found anything about ldap simple.
That's why it's not called sldap.

[#] Tue Feb 24 2009 14:46:04 EST from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I always thought SNMP was ironically named.

[#] Tue Feb 24 2009 16:10:17 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I was referring to *our* support resources, but you're right, they're still going to be pests. I'm hoping that anyone smart enough to already have LDAP running will have a base level of smarts ... wishful thinking, I know, but at least we can eliminate that kludgey middle step where they have to get pam_ldap configured.

[#] Mon Mar 09 2009 21:39:23 EDT from rod @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: PHP Q:

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I'm pretty sure that means $Object->Method()

I know it's impossible to search "->" in google. I did the same thing trying to figure that out.

Of course, I don't have any formal training in programming, so, there's a good chance that I have no idea what I'm talking about.

Check out this page on PHP SOAP; it shows a lot of examples of ->

Good luck.

[#] Tue Mar 10 2009 14:12:57 EDT from JohnnyL @ Uncensored

Subject: Haskell

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Haskell .... MmmmMmmm

[#] Tue Mar 10 2009 14:14:35 EDT from JohnnyL @ Uncensored

Subject: Future of language usage

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

It seems to me with less overhead than imperative languages, functional languages will first complement then eventually replace alot of imperative languages. Mostly because multiple core/cpu are to be said the future of pc hardware.



[#] Tue Mar 10 2009 15:36:44 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

How cool is this:

Remember my subether project?
I got an email from a guy today saying he had this great idea for writing a p2p network platform on which you could write applications. He went hunting around and found my project.
How cool is that, I finally had an idea BEFORE somebody else.
He told me that he asked some p2p group about it and they told him it was 'future work'. I don't know if that means 'ahead of its time' but if so, how cool is that, I'm 5 years ahead of ahead of its time.'
Someday, somebody will build this thing, and I'll be completely unfamous.

[#] Tue Mar 10 2009 22:23:16 EDT from JohnnyL @ Uncensored

Subject: The News So Far

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Man outdoes himself and builds skynet. Now everyone in India has a job doing customer support

trying to fix the T-1000 line. (Which is built using 6502 Apple II core shareware)

[#] Tue Mar 10 2009 23:07:54 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: The News So Far

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

SkyNet is nothing to worry about. They're trying to build it using Ruby On Rails, so it's never going to quite come together enough to threaten anyone.

[#] Wed Mar 11 2009 08:22:04 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: The News So Far

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

So it turns out somebody has built it:
it's called gpu

[#] Wed Mar 11 2009 13:32:43 EDT from rod @ Uncensored

Subject: Re: PHP Whois

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I don't know about any of that. If I were doing it, I'd probably look in to having some regular expressions filter that out in the apache config file; then redirect the users to the custom script or link.

I've never executed bash commands from with in PHP, but if I did, I would have bash insert what I wanted to a flat file or database record or maybe a cookie when it was done. That seems kind of sloppy though.

[#] Wed Mar 11 2009 21:45:02 EDT from rod @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I disagree about the apache implementation; not only would it be the cleanest solution, it's also the fastest with the least processing overhead and the one that is out there, in the wild, the most. There would be no reason to fall back to the whois lookup with the apache solution. In fact, I'm not really sure the point of the whois lookup. If you have the IP and you have a list of IPs...what's the problem?

[#] Thu Mar 12 2009 08:22:41 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Depends on whether he plans to distribute the code. No, I'm not talking about the license police (curse those cranky Debian folks and their "these two licenses are not teh DFSH-compliant with each other even though they're both open source!!!1" nonsense). I'm talking about the difficulty level of configuring it and making it work.

If you're only building it once, for your own site, then you go ahead and use whatever components make sense and get the job done with minimum hassle and maximum reliability.

If you're planning to distribute the code, you have to aim for the smallest possible number of steps between download and up-and-running. For a web application, that means you try really, really hard to avoid making the user edit Apache config files.

In the LAMP universe, the best installs are the ones that bring up a configuration page, let you self-configure the application, and then say "here, paste this into MySQL to create your db"

And then there are those lunatics who solve the problem by writing their own web servers... :)

[#] Thu Mar 12 2009 09:57:20 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Authenticating by IP address still has an amateurish feel to it. You should be doing something using public/private key authentication.

[#] Mon Mar 16 2009 19:11:33 EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

RSS Icons more and more and more...

s.b. to put 3 quarter circle stripes elegantely next to our beloved castle?

[#] Tue Mar 17 2009 16:03:39 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I'm converting a C++ program I have to C and I have to say it's very confining. I've forgotten all of my C tricks, because C++ has those handy destructors..

[#] Tue Mar 17 2009 17:01:41 EDT from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

If nothing else, I love C++'s destructors.

Go to page: First ... 20 21 22 23 [24] 25 26 27 28 ... Last