Language:
switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: First ... 66 67 68 69 [70] 71 72 73 74 ... Last
[#] Wed May 25 2016 12:00:14 EDT from Ragnar Danneskjold @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The anti-Trump protestors are flying the Mexican flag.

Something tells me that when you're flying a foreign flag and violently protesting that you should be treated as an enemy combatant.

[#] Wed May 25 2016 13:08:45 EDT from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Could be worse:
http://9gag.com/gag/a0prnwB  




[#] Wed May 25 2016 13:08:12 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Crossing the border illegally is an act of war and should be treated as such.
We wouldn't need The Wall if we simply declared open season on illegal border crossers. No bagging limit.

[#] Wed May 25 2016 16:35:26 EDT from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

This is why I like Trump, but it is his biggest fault... the man has no filter, no gate for what he should or shouldn't say.

Warren blasts Trump; he calls her 'Pocahontas'



[#] Wed May 25 2016 16:49:26 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Most non-commies call her "Fauxcahontas" actually.

And I guarantee, as usual, that Trump's comments are only going to offend people who were planning to vote democrat/hitler anyway.



[#] Thu May 26 2016 13:13:10 EDT from vince-q @ Cascade Lodge BBS

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

For those who may not yet know, Trump has clinched the nomination.

[#] Fri May 27 2016 06:16:15 EDT from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I was surprised there were no comments.  People either passed out from excitement or face palming themselves too hard.



[#] Fri May 27 2016 10:28:49 EDT from vince-q @ Cascade Lodge BBS

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

So Bernie wants to debate with The Donald.
Good for Bernie; nothing but downside rise for DJT.
The upside?
It would completely steal the news from Hitlery right near the CA primary.

Hmmmm....
A Trump/Sanders ticket?

Now *that* would be amusing (and not a 'first').

[#] Fri May 27 2016 11:28:33 EDT from Ragnar Danneskjold @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

They've been calling Trump the "presumptive nominee" since Cruz dropped out.
So it's not really news when he's got the numbers.

Now let's see if the delegates vote the way people want them to. They're not required to, and could vote against Trump... Doubt it will happen, but it could get really ugly, really quick if it does.

[#] Fri May 27 2016 11:40:23 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

If the delegates go against the wishes of the people (Trump has already received the most primary votes for any candidate in GOP history, and there are still a few states left to vote) it will be the permanent end of the Republican party, and they'll deserve it.

As for the current delegate count -- I don't think it's time to celebrate until the nomination is official.  There is still plenty of room for Bush/Cruz/Romney to pull some parliamentary dirty tricks just before or at the convention even if Trump thought he had 1,237+ going in.  The RINOs will stop at nothing to nominate a candidate who will dutifully lose the general to Hitlery as originally planned.  Perhaps the rules committee will change the threshold from 1,237 to 2,000 at the last minute.

And for 2020 they'll probably add a thousand superdelegates to the mix, just to make sure the voters never again have a chance to influence the nomination.



[#] Fri May 27 2016 11:44:54 EDT from Ragnar Danneskjold @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


And for 2020 they'll probably add a thousand superdelegates to the
mix, just to make sure the voters never again have a chance to
influence the nomination.


The superdelegates are a nasty little trick of the Democrats.... Hopefully the Republicans don't adopt the same.

[#] Fri May 27 2016 12:38:30 EDT from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

It would completely steal the news from Hitlery right near the CA
primary.

Honestly, it's all over but the shouting. Hillary has not clinched it YET, but mathematically it's a lock.

There are 917 delegates still up for grabs. She only needs 74. If Sanders had any honor, he would concede already.

[#] Fri May 27 2016 12:51:53 EDT from Ragnar Danneskjold @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

There are 917 delegates still up for grabs. She only needs 74. If
Sanders had any honor, he would concede already.



He's there so he'll have more say at the convention. That's it.

[#] Sun May 29 2016 00:03:25 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Some of the candidates are dishonest, some are provocative, but Sanders is just batshit insane. His Twitter feed reads like a badly written Marxov chain generator.

(Heh. See what I did there?)

[#] Sun May 29 2016 08:26:37 EDT from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

All the candidates are dishonest and insane.

 

no-vote.jpg



[#] Sun May 29 2016 12:58:42 EDT from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

He's there so he'll have more say at the convention. That's it.

His negative attacks are sufficiently toxic to the party that it calls his loyalty into question. Maybe calling off the poodles is not going to happen, but if he wants to actually shape events I'm not so sure he's taking the right tack.

[#] Mon May 30 2016 11:02:20 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

One thing you have to credit to Sanders is that, like Obama, he is ideologically pure. The ideology is flawed to the point where it borders on treason, but he is pure about it. The same cannot be said for Clinton, for whom liberal ideology is merely a means to an end, the end being the amassment of wealth and power for herself.

And that's the only faint glimmer of hope, if through the hard work of ultra left wing America haters like Bill Kristoll, she happens to get elected. If public opinion and political expediency make it more personally profitable (both in financial and political capital) to side with America for a while, Hitlery will do that, just like Bill did during the Gingrich-powered boom years of the late 1990's.

[#] Mon May 30 2016 17:52:45 EDT from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

for Clinton, for whom liberal ideology is merely a means to an end, the

end being the amassment of wealth and power for herself.

And if you think that's any different from Trump, I've got a bankrupt casino I can sell you.

[#] Mon May 30 2016 21:21:27 EDT from Ragnar Danneskjold @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I see the libertarians are hard at work trying to be a viable third party alternative....

http://tinyurl.com/gwcrk9f

[#] Tue May 31 2016 08:30:06 EDT from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Mon May 30 2016 09:21:27 PM EDT from Ragnar Danneskjold @ Uncensored
I see the libertarians are hard at work trying to be a viable third party alternative.... 

Viable SECOND party.  We have a one party system now, two wings, same bird of prey.  



Go to page: First ... 66 67 68 69 [70] 71 72 73 74 ... Last