Language:
switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: First ... 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 ... Last
[#] Mon Feb 15 2016 11:01:12 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

It certainly is plausible, considering that an appointment to the Supreme Court would allow him to continue to be a Constitution-shredding activist for the remainder of his career.  But really, if the position of UN Secretary General is available, and the globalists are offering it to him, I think he would rather accept a position that allows him to be "King of the World."

If for whatever reason he's not allowed to hold that position indefinitely, he can always put out a hit on another Supreme Court justice later on.

Now, if Mitch McConnell has any balls -- and if he does, he certainly hasn't shown them yet -- he will make good on his promise to keep that nomination out of King Obama's hands.  What I'd like to see is for President Trump to nominate Sheriff Joe Arpaio to the SCOTUS next year.



[#] Mon Feb 15 2016 11:16:07 EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

2016-02-14 14:19 from vince-q @uncnsrd
And then, of course, there is the expressed interest on the part of
Hillary Clinton when asked, only a few weeks back, about apointing
Obama to the Supreme Court.

Only one former president in US history has gone on to serve on the Supreme Court, and that was William H Taft, the conservative Republican--who went on to become Chief Justice.

[#] Mon Feb 15 2016 11:26:20 EST from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Eric Holder has a better chance.

 

 



[#] Tue Feb 16 2016 12:33:41 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The other name being floated is Loretta Lynch. It is being speculated that they will play the race card against anyone who opposes Obama's nominee.

[#] Thu Feb 18 2016 16:00:51 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Since we're on the subject of liberty-hating communist pigs:

Some ultra-communist left wing lunatic named "Pope Francis" declared today that anyone who wants to build border walls to stop illegal immigration is "not a Christian."

The hypocrisy here is mind blowing:

1. "Pope Francis" is not a Christian either. He serves *two* non-Christian religions, neither of which accepts the Bible as the single and final authority.

2. He lives in a place called "The Vatican" which is itself surrounded by walls.


Hey Francis, you unholy piece of crap. You don't get to make declarations like that.

[#] Thu Feb 18 2016 16:51:25 EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Quote: Sanders' plans have "evolved into magic flying puppies with winning Lotto tickets tied to their collars."

http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2016/02/sanders-campaign-has-crossed-neverland



Yeah, I'm pretty much out of the closet as "against Sanders." Just don't ask me who I'm "for" :-/

[#] Thu Feb 18 2016 16:52:26 EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Here comes the predictable laughter: HAHAHA, LoanShark CITED MOTHERJONES AS IF IT'S A CREDIBLE SOURCE!

What matters here is context. The lefties (who care about credibility) don't even like Sanders ;)

[#] Thu Feb 18 2016 17:13:08 EST from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Thu Feb 18 2016 04:00:51 PM EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

Since we're on the subject of liberty-hating communist pigs:

 

Are you ready to accept everything is F'ed up and pullsheet?



[#] Thu Feb 18 2016 17:16:18 EST from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

 

Thu Feb 18 2016 04:52:26 PM EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored

Here comes the predictable laughter: HAHAHA, LoanShark CITED MOTHERJONES AS IF IT'S A CREDIBLE SOURCE!

I read the article, I didn't think it was pro-Sanders, I thought it was negative to both Friedman and Sanders.

 



[#] Thu Feb 18 2016 18:42:41 EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


yes, that was the point...

[#] Thu Feb 18 2016 18:49:39 EST from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

ok, I misunderstood your point so.... ahahahahaha CITED MOTHERJONES AS IF IT'S A CREDIBLE SOURCE!



[#] Thu Feb 18 2016 19:06:46 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Here comes the predictable laughter: HAHAHA, LoanShark CITED
MOTHERJONES AS IF IT'S A CREDIBLE SOURCE!

Mother Jones has been a very useful publication for me lately.

Specifically ... lately I've been trolling the shit out of National Review, telling their ultra-liberal editors that their publication has become 100% equivalent to Mother Jones.

Zombie William F. Buckley needs to go in there and remind everyone that Rubio is Hitler.

[#] Thu Feb 18 2016 19:08:23 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Are you ready to accept everything is F'ed up and pullsheet?

Ask me again after the RNC. If the nominee is anyone other than Trump then yes, America is over and the planet needs to be put out of its misery.

[#] Thu Feb 18 2016 20:02:11 EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

2016-02-18 18:49 from zooer @uncnsrd
ok, I misunderstood your point so.... ahahahahaha CITED MOTHERJONES
AS IF IT'S A CREDIBLE SOURCE!

That's the spirit! Next time, spray it!

[#] Sat Feb 20 2016 22:40:16 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Big win for Trump tonight, and a little win for Hitlery. Good results.

What's really pathetic is that I had to put on CNN instead of FOX News to get the most even-handed coverage. Megyn Kelly was so upset over Trump's victory that she had blood coming out of her wherever. It was too ugly to watch. :)

Rubio's speech was so scripted, so robotic, so boring, that it was difficult to tell whether he knew he lost by more than 10%.

And I'm disappointed that Jeb Common Core Open Borders Liberal Democrat Bush has dropped out of the race. He was useful for sucking a few votes away from Rubio. The RINO vote will now solidly consolidate around Rubio, which is bad for the America/Trump team.

I have to object to the pundits' constant insistence that evangelicals prefer Cruz and the college-educated prefer Rubio. I am both, and I have a strong preference for Trump. He's the only candidate who has articulated a clear platform, an anti-establishment position, and a willingness to get things done. As a bonus, his wife would be a first lady we'd actually want to look at. After eight years of that disgusting hyper-fugly MoochHell, we need that!

[#] Sun Feb 21 2016 07:08:18 EST from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

meh



[#] Sun Feb 21 2016 17:29:48 EST from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Politics is all bullshit.  If Trump is elected, how quickly will all the Trump supporters start screaming that they were fooled yet again by another "RINO"?*

TRUMP, DONALD
NEW YORK, NY 10022
THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION 5/1/02 $1,000

Clinton, Hillary (D)

TRUMP, DONALD J
NEW YORK, NY 10022
THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION 3/23/05 $1,000 Clinton, Hillary (D)
TRUMP, DONALD J
NEW YORK, NY 10022
THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION 4/6/05 $5,000 Democratic Senatorial Campaign Cmte (D)
TRUMP, DONALD J
NEW YORK, NY 10022
THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION 9/30/05 $900 Clinton, Hillary (D)
 
TRUMP, DONALD J
NEW YORK, NY 10022
THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION 6/19/06 $20,000 Democratic Congressional Campaign Cmte (D)
TRUMP, DONALD J JR
NEW YORK, NY 10022
THE TRUMP ORGANIZATION 6/19/06 $15,000 Democratic Congressional Campaign Cmte (D)
TRUMP, DONALD J
NEW YORK, NY 10022
TRUMP ORGANIZATION 2/18/10 $2,000 Weiner, Anthony D (D)
TRUMP, DONALD J
NEW YORK, NY 10022
TRUMP DEVELOPMENT CORP 3/1/06 $2,100 Rangel, Charles B (D)
TRUMP, DONALD J
NEW YORK, NY 10022
TRUMP DEVELOPMENT CORP 3/1/06 $1,900 Rangel, Charles B (D)

Much more at the SOURCE https://goo.gl/AbGqpt

I await your excuses and defense of The Donald's and his actions.

 

(* probably the same amount of time as all the people that were fooled by Sanders and screamed "DINO"   or would it be SINO?)



[#] Sun Feb 21 2016 23:31:25 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

That was debunked a long time ago.  Trump freely admits that he's given money to politicians in both parties.  He's pretty straightforward about saying that it exemplifies how politicians are owned by their donors, so it's natural that as a businessman he bought politicians.  It pretty much *is* his platform that he's not accepting money from big donors, so that he is accountable only to the people.

Whether he holds true to that after election is, of course, something that remains to be seen.  But it's still the most viable offer to the voters we've seen so far.

As for the distribution of money ... between 1989 and the present, Trump has given $584,850 to Democrats and $961,140 to Republicans.  (Source: http://tinyurl.com/p3rm5mp )

The liberal democrats known as "The RNC" have apparently decided that Rubio, not Bush, is their man.  I still fully expect that they will declare a brokered convention even if Trump has 95% of the delegates.  And if Marco Rino is the nominee, I will join zooer in staying home on November 8.  (But I'll probably stay at my own home.)

There's a Senate seat up this year, but here in the People's Republic of New York it's doubtful that anyone could beat Chucky Schmucky Schumer.  In fact, it is widely believed that Schmucky will be Harry Reid's successor.  It would be nice if Schmucky would "have an accident while exercising" like Reid did.



[#] Mon Feb 22 2016 03:09:30 EST from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Oh yes, it is always nice when someone gets hurt.  /sarcasm

"Debunked"... that is an odd word to use, there is nothing to debunk.  Trump serves Trump and only Trump.  All politicians serve themselves, but if you want to believe it will be different this time by all means, go head. 



[#] Wed Feb 24 2016 00:02:44 EST from ax25 @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

John McAfee - Libertarian candidate, and pro giving the FBI what they want.  No conflict there.



Go to page: First ... 53 54 55 56 [57] 58 59 60 61 ... Last