switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: First ... 54 55 56 57 [58] 59 60 61 62 ... Last
[#] Mon Feb 08 2016 15:45:23 EST from vince-q @ Cascade Lodge BBS

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Seems there is a minor tempest brewing on the net concerning who first used the word TRUMPERTANTRUM.

As you may know, this word surfaced about a week ago, with Ted Cruz mentioning it, and later with Trump humorously saying he liked it.

A woman somewhere in Maryland alleged, today, that *she* invented it a couple weeks ago in an interview.

They are - apparently - all wrong.

The domain "" was registered in AUG 2015.
Go see for yourselves.
A simple "WHOIS" at any *nix command line works.

[#] Tue Feb 09 2016 11:19:25 EST from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Bernie Sanders always looks like someone took the last jelly doughnut just before he tried to get it.




That last doughnut is MINE!

[#] Tue Feb 09 2016 11:20:27 EST from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

For you text client people, there are pictures in that post, do an image search for Bernie Sanders and you will see.

[#] Wed Feb 10 2016 13:48:59 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I'm having a hard time understanding how anyone other than the most ultra-leftist weirdos who have no clue how an economy works can support Sanders.

[#] Wed Feb 10 2016 14:26:03 EST from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Free everything.  There are very wealthy people that support him because of wealth guilt and the you like him because of that free everything fantasy.   He talks bullshit well.


....and free doughnuts at his rallies.

[#] Wed Feb 10 2016 22:11:51 EST from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The "I side with" site is running.

It says I side with Trump... 86% of the time ...ugh.
I wonder how the "least important to most important rankings figure into the calculation."

Trump, Rubio, Cruz, Fiorina, Carson and then Gary Johnson, Christie, Bush, Sanders, Stein, Kasich, and Clinton.

And here I thought I hated them all.

[#] Thu Feb 11 2016 09:49:39 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The problem with "I Side With" is that it gauges candidates' policy positions on their public statements, not on their records. I know this is going to come as a shock to some, but politicians have a tendency to lie.

Yesterday I spent some of my free time trolling the shit out of National Review. It was time well spent. These days they are indistinguishable from Mother Jones.

[#] Thu Feb 11 2016 10:20:35 EST from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The problem with POLITICS is that candidates are based on what they say and not what they do.



[#] Thu Feb 11 2016 22:19:26 EST from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

At all these press conferences be sure to watch the bobble-heads behind the candidates.  These are the people that bounce their head up and down in agreement with whatever foolish crap is coming out of the politicians head.  These people crack me up and their are behind every politician.  

[#] Fri Feb 12 2016 15:24:10 EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

this is going to come as a shock to some, but politicians have a
tendency to lie.

This is most convenient for, in no particular order, Trump, Fiorina, Carson, Gary Johnson to a slightly lesser extent, and Stein. None of these people have any voting record at all, except for Gary Johnson (I include him on this list because he has no legislative voting record, having served only one political job, as the head of the executive branch of New Mexico.)

And for some reason, in the current political climate, having no voting record is considered a virtue. But in a way, it makes it easier for a candidate to lie with impunity - there is no prior voting record to reality-check against, when subjecting them to scrutiny.

[#] Sun Feb 14 2016 09:51:03 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

So ... it seems that Obama and his globalist pals have decided that they're having so much trouble getting rid of Donald Trump, that they're executing Plan B.

They actually murdered Antonin Scalia so that they can stack the Supreme Court with another communist socialist America-hating liberal and finish off what's left of America before King Obama moves from the White House to his new post as UN Secretary General.   Sad times, these are.

President Trump's inauguration is on Friday, January 20, 2017.  I'm sure they've already drawn up the Articles of Impeachment and will formally submit them on Monday, January 23, 2017.

It is my sincere and deep wish that Obama will not be able to appoint Scalia's replacement for the exact same reason that Scalia needs a replacement.

[#] Sun Feb 14 2016 14:19:42 EST from vince-q @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

And then, of course, there is the expressed interest on the part of Hillary Clinton when asked, only a few weeks back, about apointing Obama to the Supreme Court.

This would be an ideal scenario for her since that would absolutely guarantee that her emails would never be made completely public and any impeachment attempt would, therefore, fail.

As a parallel, think of it as Richard Nixon appointing Haldeman to the Supreme Court right after Watergate "broke"...

[#] Mon Feb 15 2016 11:01:12 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

It certainly is plausible, considering that an appointment to the Supreme Court would allow him to continue to be a Constitution-shredding activist for the remainder of his career.  But really, if the position of UN Secretary General is available, and the globalists are offering it to him, I think he would rather accept a position that allows him to be "King of the World."

If for whatever reason he's not allowed to hold that position indefinitely, he can always put out a hit on another Supreme Court justice later on.

Now, if Mitch McConnell has any balls -- and if he does, he certainly hasn't shown them yet -- he will make good on his promise to keep that nomination out of King Obama's hands.  What I'd like to see is for President Trump to nominate Sheriff Joe Arpaio to the SCOTUS next year.

[#] Mon Feb 15 2016 11:16:07 EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

2016-02-14 14:19 from vince-q @uncnsrd
And then, of course, there is the expressed interest on the part of
Hillary Clinton when asked, only a few weeks back, about apointing
Obama to the Supreme Court.

Only one former president in US history has gone on to serve on the Supreme Court, and that was William H Taft, the conservative Republican--who went on to become Chief Justice.

[#] Mon Feb 15 2016 11:26:20 EST from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Eric Holder has a better chance.



[#] Tue Feb 16 2016 12:33:41 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The other name being floated is Loretta Lynch. It is being speculated that they will play the race card against anyone who opposes Obama's nominee.

[#] Thu Feb 18 2016 16:00:51 EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Since we're on the subject of liberty-hating communist pigs:

Some ultra-communist left wing lunatic named "Pope Francis" declared today that anyone who wants to build border walls to stop illegal immigration is "not a Christian."

The hypocrisy here is mind blowing:

1. "Pope Francis" is not a Christian either. He serves *two* non-Christian religions, neither of which accepts the Bible as the single and final authority.

2. He lives in a place called "The Vatican" which is itself surrounded by walls.

Hey Francis, you unholy piece of crap. You don't get to make declarations like that.

[#] Thu Feb 18 2016 16:51:25 EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Quote: Sanders' plans have "evolved into magic flying puppies with winning Lotto tickets tied to their collars."

Yeah, I'm pretty much out of the closet as "against Sanders." Just don't ask me who I'm "for" :-/

[#] Thu Feb 18 2016 16:52:26 EST from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Here comes the predictable laughter: HAHAHA, LoanShark CITED MOTHERJONES AS IF IT'S A CREDIBLE SOURCE!

What matters here is context. The lefties (who care about credibility) don't even like Sanders ;)

[#] Thu Feb 18 2016 17:13:08 EST from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Thu Feb 18 2016 04:00:51 PM EST from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

Since we're on the subject of liberty-hating communist pigs:


Are you ready to accept everything is F'ed up and pullsheet?

Go to page: First ... 54 55 56 57 [58] 59 60 61 62 ... Last