Language:
switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: First ... 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 ... Last
[#] Thu May 28 2015 18:36:57 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Cool. Obviously the Bilderbergs and Rothschilds need to invoke a mass casualty of their depositors in order to avoid a run on the banks.

(Is it just me, or does "Bilderberg" sound way too much like "Build-A-Bear"?)

[#] Fri May 29 2015 12:05:59 EDT from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Bugbear?

[#] Mon Jun 01 2015 08:31:02 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


So ... key provisions of the Patriot Act have expired.

Does anyone really think that the NSA is going to stop snooping just because it technically isn't allowed anymore? That would be a bit on the naive side.

Meanwhile, it's replacement, called the "USA Freedom Act" (seriously, who comes up with these names?) is trying to make its way through clowngress. Unsurprisingly, opposition is coming from Rand Paul, whose opponents are *shameless* -- "He obviously has a higher priority for his fundraising and political ambitions than for the security of the nation" -- that's from kommie komrade Sen. John Hussein Hitler McCain. Someone please remove the "R" from his name using a chainsaw.

[#] Mon Jun 01 2015 10:43:54 EDT from vince-q @ Cascade Lodge BBS

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The three-letter agencies have been doing rampant phone-snooping with or without warrants since at least the late 1960s.

Nothing new here. At all.

[#] Mon Jun 01 2015 10:48:43 EDT from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

They give them feel good names so people will accept them. Usually the name is the opposite of what happens
when the law is passed.

"Safe Act"
"Fairness doctrine"
"Patriot act"
"Affordable Health Care Act"

I have wondered why government safety phrases have to rhyme.

"Click it or ticket"
"Drive 55, stay alive."

[#] Mon Jun 01 2015 11:02:53 EDT from dothebart @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

yea, but nowadays with that amount of surveillance you can easily outperform of what the Staatssicherheit in the GDR was capable of doing - by punishing people to watch each other.

Maybe its better because of that, but I don't think so.

It seems the reason the US wants to normalize the relations to Kuba is, that intelligence is simply to expensive without having the internet to aid doing it?



[#] Mon Jun 01 2015 11:15:26 EDT from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I thought it was the sugar. Cheap sugar. We are switching everything from high fructose corn syrup to sugar,
we need more sugar. Cuba has sugar.

[#] Mon Jun 01 2015 13:16:59 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The price difference between sugar and HFCS has less to do with Cuba, and more to do with the corn lobby manipulating prices of both commodities. As is the case with almost everything, the problem would be solved by *less* meddling, not more.

Anyway, it is frequently pointed out by realists that we wouldn't need so much surveillance if we simply stopped allowing terrorists to enter the country.

[#] Wed Jun 03 2015 12:59:13 EDT from vince-q @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

When Cuba is fully restored as "legal" watch for The Donald to reopen one of those famous (from Godfather II) casinos....

[#] Tue Jun 09 2015 07:15:40 EDT from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Maryland apparently passed legislation recently to force licensed drivers to maintain 'Mexican Coverage' (as the line item on my bill calls it) on their insurance policy.

I shit you not.

I am so angry, I want to cost landscapers and builders a lot of money.

[#] Tue Jun 09 2015 10:43:41 EDT from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I know you need Canadian coverage to drive in Canada, does it describe what Mexican coverage is?

For Maryland that sounds borderline racist.

[#] Tue Jun 09 2015 11:14:28 EDT from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


We have a problem, in Maryland, of Certain Individuals from a Certain Country not insuring their vehicles when they drive around like a maniac in this state.

We're now required to shoulder the insurance they refuse, by law, to get.

[#] Tue Jun 09 2015 17:15:46 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I'll pay extra if any uninsured drivers are immediately and permanently deported to their countries of origin upon discovery of their existence. Illegal immigration is called illegal immigration because it is illegal (communists call them "undocumented guest workers" or now "international commuters" but they are actually war criminals and should be treated as such).

Also we should deport anyone who is opposed to deporting the illegal immigrants.
Then we should bust up the unions (using as much violence as possible), repeal ObamaCare, nuke Redmond, and draw-and-quarter Al Sharpton.

[#] Wed Jun 10 2015 00:07:29 EDT from vince-q @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Also we should deport anyone who is opposed to deporting the illegal

immigrants.

Better idea:
Anyone opposed to deporting illegal 'immigrants' should be required to take in such a person as a free resident of their home, assuming all responsibilities therewith involved.

[#] Wed Jun 10 2015 08:40:34 EDT from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

In Florida there was a big problem with illegals.... whooops "aspiring citizens" and driving. A saw numerous
collisions and as soon as they could get out of the cars, everyone in the cars ran as fast and as far as they
could.

[#] Wed Jun 10 2015 13:09:14 EDT from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


"Was" a big problem?

How did Florida solve this problem?

Ah, wait... Stand Your Ground laws...

[#] Fri Jun 12 2015 20:45:48 EDT from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

No, I am guessing it still is a problem.

But on a side note the democrats were kind enough to allow Hatians to move to America, collect welfare and
housing and all they have to do is vote democrat.

As much as I miss a lot about Florida I don't miss that area of Florida.

[#] Mon Jun 15 2015 23:43:36 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Well, we all knew it would happen, and today it did.

Jeb "George W" Bush has entered the 2016 race.

He's a communist socialist America-hating Obama-loving democrat. If he wins the GOP primary, it is virtually guaranteed that Hitlery Cunton will win the general election.

It could be argued that the Republican Party is simply a branch of the Democrat Party whose only purpose in life is to give the false appearance of an opposition.

Jeb Common Core Open Borders W Bush needs to go away. He needs to go away now, and he needs to stay out of public life forever.

But it's probably fixed. The powers that be have already decided that Jeb W. Bush and Hitlery Cunton are the "choices" that will appear to us in 2016.

Fucking lizards, I hate them all.

[#] Tue Jun 16 2015 09:59:34 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Speaking of ultra left wing communists:

[ http://tinyurl.com/oz3kz92 ]

Comrade "Pope" Francis, who worships at the temple of the false religion of global warming, is about to release his Kommunist Katholic Manifesto telling us that we need to stop using energy and also roll out a One World Government to ensure that we stop using energy.

Regardless of whether one believes that Catholicism is a legitimate form of Christianity (I don't, but I respect those who do, with the exception of my mother) ... we all need to agree that "Pope" Francis is an enemy of the universe.

[#] Tue Jun 16 2015 12:27:42 EDT from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

It could be argued that the Republican Party is simply a branch of the
Democrat Party whose only purpose in life is to give the false
appearance of an opposition.


Where have I heard this before?

Go to page: First ... 41 42 43 44 [45] 46 47 48 49 ... Last