Language:
switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: First ... 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 ... Last
[#] Sun May 10 2015 14:22:21 EDT from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

But will she get your vote in the general election? Because you know.... lesser evil.

[#] Mon May 11 2015 10:30:32 EDT from @

Subject: Fiorina answers NBC's website flap questions by snapping up 'ChuckTodd.org'

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

After Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina was questioned on NBC's "Meet the Press" by host Chuck Todd about a cyber-squatter snapping up www.carlyfiorina.org and using it as a forum to slam Fiorina’s record at Hewlett-Packard, Fiorina answered back.

http://feeds.foxnews.com/~r/foxnews/politics/~3/Hted5LxJXVw/


[#] Mon May 11 2015 11:58:08 EDT from vince-q @ Cascade Lodge BBS

Subject: Re: Fiorina answers NBC's website flap questions by snapping up 'ChuckTodd.org'

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

2015-05-11 07:30 from @cascade in >
Subject: Fiorina answers NBC's website flap questions by snapping up 'ChuckTodd.org'

After Republican presidential candidate Carly Fiorina was questioned
on NBC's "Meet the Press" by host Chuck Todd about a cyber-squatter
snapping up www.carlyfiorina.org and using it as a forum to slam
Fiorina’s record at Hewlett-Packard, Fiorina answered back.

http://feeds.foxnews.com/~r/foxnews/politics/~3/Hted5LxJXVw/


This one is a 'must read' - copy/paste the URL if you are using the text client. Hysterical!!!

[#] Mon May 11 2015 11:53:16 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

That depends on who else is on the ballot.

[#] Mon May 11 2015 15:08:40 EDT from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Vince, the text client handles http but not https... Thanks Obama.

[#] Mon May 11 2015 15:15:08 EDT from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I thought the video was going to be funny.

[#] Wed May 13 2015 08:55:53 EDT from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


I have no respect for people who cybersquat.

[#] Wed May 13 2015 09:15:08 EDT from wizard of aahz @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

fleeb - how about if instead of just squatting, they do something entertaining, funny, relevant and irreverent with the site and just refuse to give up the site name?

-Ari

[#] Wed May 13 2015 09:15:40 EDT from wizard of aahz @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

and yes. I did just sign a post. <Sigh>

[#] Wed May 13 2015 10:36:02 EDT from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


I'm okay with that, aahz.

Mostly because it involves effort, so you're actually contributing something.
It takes time, which in term requires some money, etc. You are creating something.

(And it suggests you can't just whimsically do this for thousands of people you hate to spread misery... you have to focus your efforts and sustain them).

[#] Wed May 13 2015 13:54:15 EDT from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

[#] Thu May 14 2015 12:05:01 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

fleeb - how about if instead of just squatting, they do something
entertaining, funny, relevant and irreverent with the site and just
refuse to give up the site name?

Yes. That.

The original owners of PETA.ORG were a group called "People Eating Tasty Animals"

At that time, the site was funny, irreverant, entertaining, and still managed to make some good points.

Later on, they were lawyer-bullied into giving up their domain name. A hypercommunist hate group called People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals took over the domain, and to this day are using it to distribute their hate and propaganda.

[#] Fri May 15 2015 11:36:32 EDT from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Yeah, but again, it involved effort.

What that one person is doing is directing traffic for one destination to another, involving no effort, and undermining the point of DNS; to make it easier to find the content you seek.

To a logical extreme, if people snatched up DNS entries and redirected them to seemingly-random places, one would have to come up with a collection of character unthought-of to have a DNS presence on the internet. One may as well use IP addresses at that point, if you're forced to use something like atjdisjels.com as the DNS for your website because everything is redirected to anything from cute kittens to runny feces.

I don't mind if you choose to take a DNS and do something amusing with it... but that isn't what she's doing. She's being a bitch.

[#] Thu May 28 2015 16:26:45 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


It's summer. Everyone please build or attend a campfire, hang out with friends and/or family, and enjoy the fireside while making and eating s'mores.

If for no other reason, do it in defiance of the hyper-ugly mega-cunt Michelle Obama:

[ http://eagnews.org/government-smores-michelle-os-food-police-reinventing-campfire-treat/ ]

Yes that's right, folks ... MoochHell Osama wants you to stop eating s'mores.

[#] Thu May 28 2015 18:36:57 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Cool. Obviously the Bilderbergs and Rothschilds need to invoke a mass casualty of their depositors in order to avoid a run on the banks.

(Is it just me, or does "Bilderberg" sound way too much like "Build-A-Bear"?)

[#] Fri May 29 2015 12:05:59 EDT from LoanShark @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


Bugbear?

[#] Mon Jun 01 2015 08:31:02 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


So ... key provisions of the Patriot Act have expired.

Does anyone really think that the NSA is going to stop snooping just because it technically isn't allowed anymore? That would be a bit on the naive side.

Meanwhile, it's replacement, called the "USA Freedom Act" (seriously, who comes up with these names?) is trying to make its way through clowngress. Unsurprisingly, opposition is coming from Rand Paul, whose opponents are *shameless* -- "He obviously has a higher priority for his fundraising and political ambitions than for the security of the nation" -- that's from kommie komrade Sen. John Hussein Hitler McCain. Someone please remove the "R" from his name using a chainsaw.

[#] Mon Jun 01 2015 10:43:54 EDT from vince-q @ Cascade Lodge BBS

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

The three-letter agencies have been doing rampant phone-snooping with or without warrants since at least the late 1960s.

Nothing new here. At all.

[#] Mon Jun 01 2015 10:48:43 EDT from zooer @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

They give them feel good names so people will accept them. Usually the name is the opposite of what happens
when the law is passed.

"Safe Act"
"Fairness doctrine"
"Patriot act"
"Affordable Health Care Act"

I have wondered why government safety phrases have to rhyme.

"Click it or ticket"
"Drive 55, stay alive."

Go to page: First ... 40 41 42 43 [44] 45 46 47 48 ... Last