Why did anyone need to make classic shells for Windows? The average
The "classic" shells I have seen for Windows don't get nearly classic enough for my tastes. My favorite Windows UI was still the simple, spatial Explorer layout of NT4 and Windows 95. It was still usable up through Windows 2000 but who decided that we needed to take all the toolbars and sidebars and UI trash that used to clutter browsers and move them into the once-minimalistic and efficient file explorer windows?
I thought "classic shells" was a Kraft mac n' cheese product.
The "classic" shells I have seen for Windows don't get nearly classic
enough for my tastes. My favorite Windows UI was still the simple,
spatial Explorer layout of NT4 and Windows 95. It was still usable up
The user interface of Windows was at its best when it was pretty much a direct clone of RISC OS. (You didn't think Microsoft actually created something that good themselves, did you?)
Ever since then, every release of Windows has been designed to railroad its users into using other Microsoft products and services ... Internet Explorer, Bing, Office 365, Bing, Microsoft Cloud, and have I mentioned Bing?
Microsoft's desire to use the operating system as a vehicle to drive people into their other offerings is in direct conflict with the fact that people really want the operating system to just launch programs and get out of the way.
I hear that Windows 10 can be turned into a Chrome OS workalike pretty easily.
Chrome browser running on a machine with Windows 8, 8.1, or 10, when hardware video acceleration is available, can be run in "Windows 8 mode" where it turns itself into a Metro application that looks exactly like Chrome OS, when you set it as your default browser. Combine that with the fact that Windows can be set to lock a user into running only one Metro application at startup, and you get a sort of Chrome OS equivalent.
yeah, that is kinda like what Google and Facebook are doing now. Making you use their products and their products only.
while facebook does that by simply stealing their time. (ever heard of the grey Mr. guys and momo?)
This is politics but it's also *genuine* Microsoft bashing.
[ http://tinyurl.com/hkzmc3p ]
Bernie Sanders is suspicious that Microsoft's involvement in computerized tallying of votes in the Iowa caucuses is programmed to bias the results to make Hitlery Cunton the winner.
Considering that Microsoft is the world's most evil company, founded by the worst person in all of recorded history, I can't dismiss this, even coming from a communist kook like San-duh-rs.
The thing is, if Microsoft is rigging the Iowa caucuses to make Hitlery Cunton win, that means they've probably programmed Microsoft Election Rigger 2016 to screw Sanders (who I don't care about) *and* Trump (who I do care about).
WHY CAN'T BILL GATES DIE ALREADY!!!!
The cry in 2004 was "those evil republican voting machine DIEBOLD! DIEBOLD!!!!" "They donated to the republicans!!!!1!!!!!!" I though Gates was getting more socialist as he got older, he should want Sanders. Where ever there is voting, there will be people screaming fraud, and then there is the actual fraud, and then it doesn't mater.
Even if he does win, if he wins...HAH! Even if he wins! Even if he plays so far above our heads that our noses bleed for a week to ten days; even if God in Heaven above comes down and points his hand at Bernie's side of the field; even if every man, woman and child held hands together and prayed for Bernie to win, it just wouldn't matter because all the really good looking girls would still go out with the guys from Mohawk because they've got all the money! It just doesn't matter if we win or we lose. IT JUST DOESN'T MATTER!
IT JUST DOESN'T MATTER!
IT JUST DOESN'T MATTER!
so, thats how microsoft is going to run docker and mesos clusters on azzure:
IBCS for windows.
Microsoft Iowa for Windows crashed.
And despite being crap, it still gets to run things.
(Am I talking about the presidential candidates or the software?)
Bucking the establishment, crass and willing to call out crap for what it is... sounds like both Donald Trump and Linus Torvalds.
I am not sure if this belongs in this room or in mobile madness.
Microsoft acquires SwiftKey http://www.androidauthority.com/microsoft-acquires-swiftkey-671056/
It is madness for your mobile.
I paid for Swiftkey, I don't see that option anymore, so I am a little pissed. I also paid for the Opera browser when it was shareware but I digress. I have paid for a lot of shareware over the years, but I digress again. I paid for Swiftkey because the default Samsung keyboard sucked, the predictive text was "we are going to change the word to what we think you might mean."
I really don't want to uninstall a paid app but if it has an upgrade soon and says "Mictrosoft" I will have to uninstall it and install Google's keyboard.
I think that we should pay homage to the recent fall of Germany at the hands of jihadists by making a change to computer terminology.
From now on, viruses, worms, trojans, rootkits, etc. shall no longer be referred to as "malware"
It is now referred to as: migrant software. And you aren't allowed to remove it, or you're a racist.
Subject: Microsoft's employment of Miguel and Nat is no longer a secret
Well then. Check this out.
Miguel de Icaza and Nat Friedman, enemies of open source who were paid Microsoft moles in the Linux community for many years, are now officially Microsoft employees. Microsoft has acquired their company, Xamarin.
For those who do not remember all the details:
- Miguel single-handedly prevented the unification of Linux on a single desktop (KDE) by introducing GNOME, creating a schism that disrupted (and possibly prevented) Linux's chance of success on the desktop.
- Miguel then created Mono, introducing the C# and .NET cancers into Linux.
- Nat was the loudmouth behind the (thankfully failed) "Hula" project, introduced with much hype after they rejected my suggestion to adopt Citadel as the official server to go with their client software.
Xamarin now makes a .NET runtime for both Android and iOS, which represents their collective effort to infect both of those platforms with Microsoft cancer.
this is seriously fucking annoying:
Windows 10 setup. AMD graphics card connected to my 16x10 primary monitor.
Intel HD 4600 connected to a Sony AV receiver and thence to a TV via HDMI.
This all used to work fine, but something started happening yesterday after I changed settings in Display Settings to change from "show only on [monitor] 2" to "Extend these displays" mode, or vice versa. Now, when the TV is turned off, Windows decides to stop outputting a signal to the desktop monitor - it's like christmas tree lights in series - one goes out they all go out!
This can be worked around by changing to "show only on 1" but then I'd have to change the setting every time I want to listen to audio on the stereo. Infuriating. Must be some kind of registry corruption, argh.
The weird part is that this isn't satire.
"Microsoft deletes 'teen girl' AI after it became a Hitler-loving sex robot within 24 hours"
Well I suppose that's what you get when you let Twitter teach you how to be "human" ... but really, only someone as dumb as a Microsoft developer would think to do that.
A friend of mine had an AI connected to an IRC bot. the results were similar - so this was kind of a dejavu ;-)