That goes along the line of "the reason for exchange is outlook" and "the reason for outlook is office business/pro"
I sadly have only two reasonable clients that use thunderbird. All other use Outlook, despite of all the shortcomings.
And yes, all your cloud models that are free now will probably introduce a fee at one point. Sugar sync did that, I replaced it with Seafile. Dyndns did that, and I think that was one of the dirtiest stunts ever pulled on the internet. Luckily, there are enough alternatives. Oh, and for google services, you are already paying with your privacy.
I haven't seen any alternatives to Dyn that don't either (1) charge a fee, or (2) require you to periodically visit their web site (presumably to view ads). Are there any?
The have a lovely list of domains to choose from and should be supported by ddclient (in a recent enough version or with a patch, I do not remember). The service is supported by my router, so I stopped worrying.
Oh, and NoIP tends to forget to send you the nag-email, it runs at a clients side for about 2 years now, without anybody clicking any emails.
All right ... giving afraid.org a try. I like how it's a community project (but seems to be sufficiently large with enough paying members that it's not going away anytime soon).
Now I just wish I didn't have to use the stock firmware on my MI424WR to keep the MoCA working.
And yes, we've been using Jira for ages. We tried a bunch of other things and hated them. I've never liked gmail's user interface experience. But that might just be me being old and crotchety.
The problem with software as a service is that you have to send out floppy disks with the latest version of the client, and then deal with people having different kinds of modems with different init strings, and deal with modem banks, and it can be slow...
So yeah, once the network infrastructure was in place, SaaS started to make sense. I like the idea ... but I'm starting to be concerned over the fact that we're moving towards a world where you either work for Amazon or you don't work in IT at all.
Google has an option for conversation mode. You don't have to use it.
Here's an idea: folder pane, message list pane, reading pane. Why can't Google understand that some people *like* it the traditional way?
I also don't like the message list as a vertical pane in between the folder pane and reading pane. I know it's designed for a wide screen, but even when you're given a choice (like with Outlook Web Access) the message list entries take up so much vertical space that it doesn't look right.
This is silly. It's something that *everyone* got right at some point, and was a universally accepted and understood user interface, and everyone's messing it up now.
No one is immune. The US Postal Service has introduced its new CloudCloud(tm) service, which delivers your postal mail in Teh Cloud.
They don't know how or if it works, but they're doing it anyway. Because the cloud.
Have we been discussing wether a tablet/phone/android/ios is a real computer or not in this room?
Anyway, there is a guy who writes about how an iPad became his main computer since about a year know:
You only have to take into account that his main job seems to be "writing a blawg" and he uses an iPad Pro...
I will try next month, if an iPad mini 2 could get me through the day for most of my tasks. With an added keyboard, maybe a Zagg folio or something else. Only thing that I can not imagine how to solve properly is interacting with LANs on client sites. While iOS is capable of using LAN (thanks to Apple TVs), it is a crutch. And using an Airport Express might be uncomfy.
There was a discussion about "real computers" but it was skewed by a confirmation bias attempting to place iOS devices in that category and exclude Android from it. Unfortunately the reality distortion field did not die along with The Steve Jobs.
A real computer is one powerful enough to serve the purpose it was designed for. The distinction between whether an "access device" counts as a computer or just as a terminal is extremely blurry because Netscape not only won, but totally DOMINATED the browser war. Too bad they died from their battle injuries.
But just about everything is server-side now.
Eh? Iirc, the "apple huggers" (me and ragnar(?)) put tablets in the "not a computer" corner, including ios ones. We might have refused to give android any credit because it is utter shit (and not a "real" linux), but phones and tablets were no computers because of missing full filesystem access, regardless of wether they were android or ios. That is at least how I remember it.
Tablets vs Computers is like buying eastern european cars (tablets) vs western european cars (computers):
If you need to get one, buy a Skoda (ios), not a Dacia (android).