Language:
switch to room list switch to menu My folders
Go to page: First ... 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 ... Last
[#] Thu Aug 12 2010 01:58:04 EDT from Nite*Star @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

What is the diff in Ext4? Benefits? Negatives?

[#] Thu Aug 12 2010 10:03:00 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

It's mostly just the removal of 64-bit storage limits, so you can have filesystems up to 1 EB and files up to 16 TB. They did a bunch of performance enhancements and other behind-the-scenes changes as well. Unless you're running a gigantic storage system, you won't miss it if you don't upgrade.

And if you do have a gigantic storage system, btrfs is potentially more interesting.

[#] Thu Aug 12 2010 11:42:02 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

Does ext4 take up more space for small files as a result of no 64 bit limit?

[#] Thu Aug 12 2010 11:48:37 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


[#] Thu Aug 12 2010 11:56:35 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


[#] Thu Aug 12 2010 17:16:21 EDT from fleeb @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]


(Now Ford is just trying to take up more space with small messages...)

[#] Thu Aug 12 2010 19:35:45 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

no it would seem my text client got into that state again where messages it sends to the server aren't sent and all you get is a blank message.

[#] Thu Aug 12 2010 19:36:16 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

here's one of the messages as I wrote it.
Aug 12 2010 11:42am from Ford II @uncnsrd
Does ext4 take up more space for small files as a result of no 64 bit limit?

[#] Thu Aug 12 2010 19:36:33 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

andhere's another

Aug 12 2010 11:56am from Ford II
I couldn't resist, I added a comment to that bug, then I saw how many people
got mailed because of it.
I think I probably just started a flamewar.
Oh well

[#] Fri Aug 13 2010 01:59:15 EDT from Nite*Star @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I don't see your comment on that bug, Fnord ....

[#] Fri Aug 13 2010 14:13:16 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

that's because my name's not fnord.

[#] Sun Aug 15 2010 18:34:08 EDT from Nite*Star @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I looked for your real name, and your alias ... :p

[#] Mon Aug 16 2010 16:03:32 EDT from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

obviously, not the right alias. ;-)

[#] Tue Aug 17 2010 16:27:55 EDT from IGnatius T Foobar @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I had an idea.

Linus Torvalds should start mocking Richard Stallman by running around to local zoos and demanding that all of the gnus must be referred to as gnu/linuxes.

[#] Mon Nov 29 2010 10:12:12 EST from Sig @ Uncensored

Subject: Re:

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

I did a crapton of apt-geting (not much developer-related comes with desktop Ubuntu) and eventually was able to compile the current Gnome-Shell from source.  Performance and stability are underwhelming compared to the older version that I was able to get from repositories and theming seems kind of broken at the moment, but it's a work in progress and I don't sweat that much.  Once it got going, I stopped worrying about it, but it did seem to be pokey for a while out of the gate.

I could get used to it, but I actually didn't hate Unity, either.  Maybe it's because I don't have a lot of (recent) experience using other systems, but I expected it to be different and have a learning curve, so I was willing to experiment a little.  Some of the reviews I read were just ridiculous--"This doesn't work how I expect, ergo it sucks and you should stay away from it."



[#] Mon Nov 29 2010 11:53:13 EST from dothebart @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

me uses i3: http://i3.zekjur.net/

scales from tiny netbook screens to big multiscreen desktops verry well. plus: its lightning fast.

usefull feature #1: <meta> F : go away and make the current window flusscreen.

plus; it still can easily switch between virtual desktops while in fullscreen, so you can effectively switch fast between several fullscreen apps.

wanna jump from window #5 to window #42 as quick as possible: this is your WM.

if you sit in front of a wintendo, 8 similar running windows start to suck if you have to switch from one to another.

plus that the wintendo will always open new windows on your primary screen instead of simply taking the one your mouse cursor is on.

can't tell how often I see collegues double-click title bar of window, drag it from left to right screen, double click it again for fullscreen...

I3: opens window in the current frame, if its wrong, move it with <meta><shift>#desktop done!



[#] Mon Nov 29 2010 16:20:30 EST from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

It will be interesting to see whether the user community ends up
preferring GNOME Shell or Unity as the better desktop interface.

It will be the one that's the default on what ends up being the most popular distro.

[#] Mon Nov 29 2010 16:23:04 EST from Ford II @ Uncensored

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

plus that the wintendo will always open new windows on your primary
screen instead of simply taking the one your mouse cursor is on.

I happen to find this feature rather annoying. If I want to start something new, I want it to show up in front of me and I'll move it away if it's not important. Having new things show up far to my left is a problem since sometimes I don't notice it, if it's small enough.

[#] Mon Nov 29 2010 19:00:47 EST from dothebart @ Uncensored

Subject: Re:

[Reply] [ReplyQuoted] [Headers] [Print]

most probably 'your focus' is supposed to somewhere near to your mouse focus?



Go to page: First ... 49 50 51 52 [53] 54 55 56 57 ... Last